Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1238705
| From | Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings |
| Date | 2015-10-03 02:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfip4-1IO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q5l4R-J8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5l4T-J8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfb4d-8hp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfbdU-8tf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfbnB-cS-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/03/2015 12:22 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > El 02/10/15 a les 18.12, Wei Liu ha escrit: >> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:04:35PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> El 05/09/15 a les 14.39, Bob Liu ha escrit: >>>> Document multi queues/rings of xen-block. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> >>> >>> As said by Konrad, you should send this against the Xen public headers >>> also (or even before). I have a comment below. >>> Sure, I'll do that and also rebase this series after get more comments. >>>> --- >>>> include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h >>>> index c33e1c4..b453b70 100644 >>>> --- a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h >>>> +++ b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h >>>> @@ -28,6 +28,38 @@ typedef uint16_t blkif_vdev_t; >>>> typedef uint64_t blkif_sector_t; >>>> >>>> /* >>>> + * Multiple hardware queues/rings: >>>> + * If supported, the backend will write the key "multi-queue-max-queues" to >>>> + * the directory for that vbd, and set its value to the maximum supported >>>> + * number of queues. >>>> + * Frontends that are aware of this feature and wish to use it can write the >>>> + * key "multi-queue-num-queues", set to the number they wish to use, which >>>> + * must be greater than zero, and no more than the value reported by the backend >>>> + * in "multi-queue-max-queues". >>>> + * >>>> + * For frontends requesting just one queue, the usual event-channel and >>>> + * ring-ref keys are written as before, simplifying the backend processing >>>> + * to avoid distinguishing between a frontend that doesn't understand the >>>> + * multi-queue feature, and one that does, but requested only one queue. >>>> + * >>>> + * Frontends requesting two or more queues must not write the toplevel >>>> + * event-channeland ring-ref keys, instead writing those keys under sub-keys >>>> + * having the name "queue-N" where N is the integer ID of the queue/ring for >>>> + * which those keys belong. Queues are indexed from zero. >>>> + * For example, a frontend with two queues must write the following set of >>>> + * queue-related keys: >>>> + * >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/multi-queue-num-queues = "2" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0 = "" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0/ring-ref = "<ring-ref>" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0/event-channel = "<evtchn>" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-1 = "" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-1/ring-ref = "<ring-ref>" >>>> + * /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-1/event-channel = "<evtchn>" >>> >>> AFAICT, it's impossible by design to use multiple queues together with >>> multipage rings, is that right? >>> >> >> As far as I can tell, these two features are not inherently coupled. >> Whether you want to make (by design) them coupled together or not is >> another matter. :-) > > I haven't looked at the implementation yet, but some mention of whether > multipage-rings are allowed with multiqueue would be good. For example > if both can indeed be used in conjunction I would mention: > > If multi-page rings are also used, the format of the grant references > will be: > > /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0/ring-ref0 = "<ring-ref0>" > /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0/ring-ref1 = "<ring-ref1>" > /local/domain/1/device/vbd/0/queue-0/ring-ref2 = "<ring-ref2>" > [...] > True, and this is already supported. I'll update the document next version. -- Regards, -Bob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> - 2015-10-02 18:10 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> - 2015-10-02 18:20 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> - 2015-10-02 18:30 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> - 2015-10-03 02:00 +0200
csiph-web