Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1238577
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts |
| Date | 2015-10-02 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfeYb-5qP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qf2tY-4cT-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > In some cases it is useful to know if the interrupt in question has chained > handler installed. For example when a cpu is offlined the architecture code > needs to know if it has any users so that it can fixup affinity > accordingly. > > To make this possible we introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED that is set by > the core code when chained interrupt handler is installed. We also make it > possible for core and architecture code to check the flag by introducing > function irq_has_chained_handler() for this. While looking at that patch it occured to me, that we can solve this in a different way, which does not require any changes to the migration code. When we install the chained handler, we set the action of that irq descriptor to a statically allocated chained_action which provides a handler which emits a fat warning. chained handlers should never end up calling an action and if they do, it's clearly a bug. The availability of an action makes the migration code just pick it and move it along. And that fixes all architectures in one go without touching them. Sorry, that I didn't think about this right away. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-02 09:00 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] x86/irq: Take chained interrupts into account in fixup_irqs() Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-02 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-02 22:20 +0200
[PATCH v2] genirq: Allow migration of chained interrupts by installing default action Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-05 12:20 +0200
csiph-web