Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1236382
| From | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP |
| Date | 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeqym-7BV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qa5Ca-6mB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qa6eS-75X-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe44O-D4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qepVE-6Bs-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqoH-7qA-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > I prefer not to merge patches that cannot be tested. Without > > the DT bits in patch 6 the other five patches are useless. So > > I think patch 6 should be applied together with the other five > > which add the driver. > > That's crazy talk. If all subsystem maintainers abide by this rule > there would be chaos. We'd either need to send pull-requests to each > other for every set which crossed a subsystems boundary, or 1000's of > merge conflicts would ensue at merge time. > > The (sensible) rule we normally stick to is; as long as there isn't > a _build_ dependency, then the patches should filter though their > respective trees; _functional_ dependencies have nothing to do with > us as maintainers. Another chaos preventing rule we abide by is; thou > shalt not apply patches belonging to other maintainer's subsystems > without the appropriate Ack-by and a subsequent "you may take this > though your tree" and/or "please send me an immutable pull-request". So you want the series to be merged in two parts via two different trees where neither can be tested? That sounds crazy to me. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-09-30 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> - 2015-09-30 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-30 17:00 +0200
csiph-web