Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1236382

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP

From Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP
Date 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <qeqym-7BV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qa5Ca-6mB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qa6eS-75X-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe44O-D4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qepVE-6Bs-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeqoH-7qA-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > I prefer not to merge patches that cannot be tested.  Without
> > the DT bits in patch 6 the other five patches are useless.  So
> > I think patch 6 should be applied together with the other five
> > which add the driver.
> 
> That's crazy talk.  If all subsystem maintainers abide by this rule
> there would be chaos.  We'd either need to send pull-requests to each
> other for every set which crossed a subsystems boundary, or 1000's of
> merge conflicts would ensue at merge time.
> 
> The (sensible) rule we normally stick to is; as long as there isn't
> a _build_ dependency, then the patches should filter though their
> respective trees; _functional_ dependencies have nothing to do with
> us as maintainers.  Another chaos preventing rule we abide by is; thou
> shalt not apply patches belonging to other maintainer's subsystems
> without the appropriate Ack-by and a subsequent "you may take this
> though your tree" and/or "please send me an immutable pull-request".

So you want the series to be merged in two parts via two different
trees where neither can be tested? That sounds crazy to me.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-09-30 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-30 16:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-09-30 16:30 +0200
        Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for  STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> - 2015-09-30 17:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-30 17:00 +0200

csiph-web