Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1235928
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch 0/2] x86/process: Sanitize bound checks in get_wchan() and unify 32/64 bit |
| Date | 2015-09-30 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qelIm-CS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qel5D-85q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qelyF-rL-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Looks good to me. Additional kudos for READ_ONCE'es. Data races are bad. Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:38:21AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> As reported by several people the bound checks in get_wchan() on x86/64bit >> are wrong. >> >> The following series addresses that problem and as a consequence >> unifies the needlessly different implementations of 32 and 64 bit. >> >> Thanks, >> >> tglx >> >> --- >> process.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> process_32.c | 28 ---------------------------- >> process_64.c | 24 ------------------------ >> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > Hohumm, looks good to me. Especially the documentation of the stack > layout and why we're doing all that dance. > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > > Should we CC: stable? > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch 0/2] x86/process: Sanitize bound checks in get_wchan() and unify 32/64 bit Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-30 10:40 +0200
[patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-30 10:40 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-30 22:00 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-10-03 03:20 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-03 03:40 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-03 13:00 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 13:40 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2015-10-04 14:20 +0200
Re: [patch 1/2] x86/process: Add proper bound checks in 64bit get_wchan() Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 20:10 +0200
[patch 2/2] x86/process: Unify 32bit and 64bit implementations of get_wchan() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-30 10:40 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/process: Unify 32bit and 64bit implementations of get_wchan() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-30 22:10 +0200
Re: [patch 0/2] x86/process: Sanitize bound checks in get_wchan() and unify 32/64 bit Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-09-30 11:10 +0200
Re: [patch 0/2] x86/process: Sanitize bound checks in get_wchan() and unify 32/64 bit Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2015-09-30 11:20 +0200
csiph-web