Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1235722

Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd()

From Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd()
Date 2015-09-30 05:00 +0200
Message-ID <qefMC-oO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qcBHz-3cl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qcFBv-zc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qdJML-54p-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/29/2015 12:37 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/25, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> +struct ns_common *proc_ns_fdget(int fd, int nstype, struct fd *fd_ref)
>>>   {
>>> -	struct file *file;
>>> +	struct ns_common *ns;
>>> +	struct fd f;
>>>   
>>> -	file = fget(fd);
>>> -	if (!file)
>>> +	f = fdget(fd);
>>> +	if (!f.file)
>>>   		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
>>>   
>>> -	if (file->f_op != &ns_file_operations)
>>> +	if (f.file->f_op != &ns_file_operations)
>>> +		goto out_invalid;
>>> +
>>> +	ns = get_proc_ns(file_inode(f.file));
>>> +	if (nstype && (ns->ops->type != nstype))
>>>   		goto out_invalid;
>>>   
>>> -	return file;
>>> +	*fd_ref = f;
>>> +	return ns;
>>>   
>>>   out_invalid:
>>> -	fput(file);
>>> +	fdput(f);
>>>   	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>   }
>> Well yes, fdget() makes sense but this is minor.
>>
>> Honestly, I do not really like the new helper... I understand this
>> is subjective, so I won't insist. But how about 1/1? We do not need
>> fd/file at all. With this patch your sys_getvpid() can just use
>> proc_get_ns_by_fd(fd, CLONE_NEWPID) and put_pid_ns().
>>
>> Eric, what do you think?
> At some level I don't care this is not exposed to userspace.
>
> However since we are going several rounds with this.
>
> Of the existing uses several of them sleep, which unfortunately means we
> can not use rcu locking for everything.  The network namespace ones wind
> up taking a reference to struct net because the have the legacy pid case
> to deal with.  Which makes we can not use fdget for all callers either.
>
> For this translate_pid rcu locking is sufficient, rcu locking is easy
> and doing any more than rcu locking just seems silly.  So let me
> respectfully suggest.
>
> struct ns_common *ns_by_fd_rcu(int fd, int type)
> {
> 	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
> 	struct file *file;
> 	struct ns_common *ns;
> 	void *ret;
pointer files seems no more useful. we can
use fcheck(fd) instead.

Thanks,

>
> 	file = fcheck_files(files, fd);
>          if (!file)
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
>
> 	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_PATH)
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> 	if (file->f_op != &ns_file_operations)
>          	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> 	ns = get_proc_ns(file_inode(file));
> 	if (ns->ops->type != type)
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> 	return ns;
> }
>
> struct pid_namespace *pidns_by_fd_rcu(int fd)
> {
> 	struct ns_common *ns = ns_by_fd_rcu(fd, CLONE_NEWPID);
>          if (IS_ERR(ns))
> 		return ERR_CAST(ns);
> 	return container_of(ns, struct pid_namespace, ns);
> }
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(translate_pid, pid_t, pid_nr, int, sourcefd, int, targetfd)
> {
> 	struct pid_namespace *source, *target;
> 	struct pid *pid;
> 	pid_t result;
>
> 	rcu_read_lock();
>
> 	if (sourcefd >= 0)
>          	source = pidns_by_fd_rcu(sourcefd);
> 	else
> 		source = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>
> 	if (targetfd >= 0)
>          	target = pidns_by_fd_rcu(targetfd);
> 	else
> 		target = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>
> 	pid = find_pid_ns(pid_nr, source);
>          result = pid_nr_ns(pid, target);
>          if (result == 0)
> 		result = -ESRCH;
>
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
>
> 	return result;
> }
>
> Eric
> .
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH RFC v3 1/2] nsfs: replace proc_ns_fget() with proc_ns_fdget() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-09-25 16:00 +0200
  [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] pidns: introduce syscall getvpid Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-09-25 16:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] pidns: introduce syscall getvpid kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-09-28 06:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] pidns: introduce syscall getvpid ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-09-28 18:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] pidns: introduce syscall getvpid ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-09-28 19:10 +0200
  [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-25 20:10 +0200
    [PATCH 1/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-25 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2015-09-28 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-09-28 18:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 18:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-09-29 19:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 20:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2015-09-29 21:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/1] ns: introduce proc_get_ns_by_fd() Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-09-30 05:00 +0200

csiph-web