Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1235712
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in |
| Date | 2015-09-30 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qef9U-87p-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qe44N-D4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe44N-D4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Both "child->mm == mm" and "p->mm != mm" checks in oom_kill_process()
> are wrong. ->mm can be if task is the exited group leader. This means
can be [missing word here?] if task
> +static bool process_has_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t;
> +
> + for_each_thread(p, t)
> + if (t->mm)
Can t->mm change between pevious line and next line?
> + return t->mm == mm;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> /*
> * Must be called while holding a reference to p, which will be released upon
> @@ -530,7 +541,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
> list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
> unsigned int child_points;
>
> - if (child->mm == p->mm)
> + if (process_has_mm(child, p->mm))
> continue;
We hold read_lock(&tasklist_lock) but not rcu_read_lock().
Is for_each_thread() safe without rcu_read_lock()?
> /*
> * oom_badness() returns 0 if the thread is unkillable
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH -mm 0/3] mm/oom_kill: ensure we actually kill all tasks sharing the same mm Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
[PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-09-30 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-09-30 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 16:10 +0200
[PATCH -mm 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-09-30 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 16:00 +0200
[PATCH -mm v2 0/3] mm/oom_kill: ensure we actually kill all tasks sharing the same mm Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-30 20:30 +0200
csiph-web