Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1237586

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding

From Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding
Date 2015-10-01 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <qePQ5-2MU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qekVY-7TY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qetFU-3Ao-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeNEC-8aM-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Neil,

On Oct. Thursday 01 (40) 05:06 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 07:43 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> In order to cleanly unbind the dsa core, either as a module removal,
> >> or a platform device unbind, switch the allocation the their devm_
> >> counterparts and complete the destroy functions.
> >>
> >> The last patch is an experimental way to exit the probe when no
> >> switch is found in the discover process.
> >>
> >> The patches are based on the current net-next.
> > 
> > I looked at the patches and they bring DSA in a better direction. For
> > future submissions, could you CC people who recently worked on DSA, like
> > Andrew Lunn, Guenter Roeck, Vivien Didelot and myself? We can typically
> > give your patches a try fairly quickly.
> > 
> > In case you are seriously considering making DSA a loadable module,
> > there were an earlier attempt here:
> > 
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/345803
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> >>
> >> Neil Armstrong (3):
> >>   net: dsa: Use devm_ prefixed allocations
> >>   net: dsa: complete dsa_switch_destroy calls
> >>   net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found
> >>
> >>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> > 
> > 
> Hi All,
> 
> Thanks for the tests and reviews.
> 
> My first intent is to make dynamic unbind/bind reliable, the reliable loadable module support
> is a more complex target, but starting with unbind is a simpler start.
> 
> Should I re-post with the missing people, the Tested-by & without the RFC tag ?

I didn't take a look at it, but given Florian's feedback, it seems to
make sense, so I'd suggest to resend it without the RFC prefix.

If a patch in the serie got a "Tested-by:" or whatever tag, include it
when resending, only if you didn't modify this patch in the meantime.

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-09-30 10:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-10-01 17:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-10-01 19:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-10-01 17:20 +0200

csiph-web