Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1237586
| From | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding |
| Date | 2015-10-01 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qePQ5-2MU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qekVY-7TY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qetFU-3Ao-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeNEC-8aM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Neil, On Oct. Thursday 01 (40) 05:06 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 09/30/2015 07:43 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >> In order to cleanly unbind the dsa core, either as a module removal, > >> or a platform device unbind, switch the allocation the their devm_ > >> counterparts and complete the destroy functions. > >> > >> The last patch is an experimental way to exit the probe when no > >> switch is found in the discover process. > >> > >> The patches are based on the current net-next. > > > > I looked at the patches and they bring DSA in a better direction. For > > future submissions, could you CC people who recently worked on DSA, like > > Andrew Lunn, Guenter Roeck, Vivien Didelot and myself? We can typically > > give your patches a try fairly quickly. > > > > In case you are seriously considering making DSA a loadable module, > > there were an earlier attempt here: > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/345803 > > > > Thanks! > > > >> > >> Neil Armstrong (3): > >> net: dsa: Use devm_ prefixed allocations > >> net: dsa: complete dsa_switch_destroy calls > >> net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found > >> > >> net/dsa/dsa.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >> > > > > > Hi All, > > Thanks for the tests and reviews. > > My first intent is to make dynamic unbind/bind reliable, the reliable loadable module support > is a more complex target, but starting with unbind is a simpler start. > > Should I re-post with the missing people, the Tested-by & without the RFC tag ? I didn't take a look at it, but given Florian's feedback, it seems to make sense, so I'd suggest to resend it without the RFC prefix. If a patch in the serie got a "Tested-by:" or whatever tag, include it when resending, only if you didn't modify this patch in the meantime. Thanks, -v -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-09-30 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-10-01 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-10-01 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2015-10-01 17:20 +0200
csiph-web