Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1235231
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks |
| Date | 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qe50S-1Za-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qdZHQ-2IS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qdZHQ-2IS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe4Hv-1BQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:07:34AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:28 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -2960,8 +2960,10 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct
> > * schedule() atomically, we ignore that path. Otherwise whine
> > * if we are scheduling when we should not.
> > */
> > - if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD))
> > + if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD)) {
> > __schedule_bug(prev);
> > + preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
> > + }
>
> Of course, if this was not a preemption leak, but something that called
> schedule within a preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() section, when it
> returns, preemption will be enabled, right?
Indeed.. But it ensures only the task that incorrectly called schedule()
gets screwed and not everybody else.
This is most important on x86 which has a per cpu preempt_count that is
not saved/restored (after this series). So if you schedule with an
invalid (!2*PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET) preempt_count the next task is
messed up too.
Enforcing this invariant limits the borkage to just the one task.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 11:50 +0200
[tip:sched/core] sched/core: Robustify preemption leak checks tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-29 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 16:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 16:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-09-29 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 17:30 +0200
csiph-web