Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1234433

Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] nohz: task_isolation: allow tick to be fully disabled

From Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] nohz: task_isolation: allow tick to be fully disabled
Date 2015-09-28 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <qdNx0-23T-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qdNx0-23T-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qdNx0-23T-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote:
> While the current fallback to 1-second tick is still helpful for
> maintaining completely correct kernel semantics, processes using
> prctl(PR_SET_TASK_ISOLATION) semantics place a higher priority on
> running completely tickless, so don't bound the time_delta for such
> processes.  In addition, due to the way such processes quiesce by
> waiting for the timer tick to stop prior to returning to userspace,
> without this commit it won't be possible to use the task_isolation
> mode at all.
>
> Removing the 1-second cap was previously discussed (see link
> below) and Thomas Gleixner observed that vruntime, load balancing
> data, load accounting, and other things might be impacted.
> Frederic Weisbecker similarly observed that allowing the tick to
> be indefinitely deferred just meant that no one would ever fix the
> underlying bugs.  However it's at least true that the mode proposed
> in this patch can only be enabled on a nohz_full core by a process
> requesting task_isolation mode, which may limit how important it is
> to maintain scheduler data correctly, for example.

What goes wrong when a task enables this?  Presumably either tasks
that enable it experience problems or performance issues or it should
always be enabled.

One possible issue: __vdso_clock_gettime with any of the COARSE clocks
as well as __vdso_time will break if the timekeeping code doesn't run
somewhere with reasonable frequency on some core.  Hopefully this
always works.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] nohz: task_isolation: allow tick to be fully disabled Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-09-28 22:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] nohz: task_isolation: allow tick to be fully  disabled Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 15:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] nohz: task_isolation: allow tick to be fully  disabled Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-01 16:20 +0200

csiph-web