Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1233439
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog |
| Date | 2015-09-26 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qd5ml-3GR-55@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qd4Tf-384-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
[ Upstream commit 2c17d27c36dcce2b6bf689f41a46b9e909877c21 ]
Incoming packet should be either in backlog queue or
in RCU read-side section. Otherwise, the final sequence of
flush_backlog() and synchronize_net() may miss packets
that can run without device reference:
CPU 1 CPU 2
skb->dev: no reference
process_backlog:__skb_dequeue
process_backlog:local_irq_enable
on_each_cpu for
flush_backlog => IPI(hardirq): flush_backlog
- packet not found in backlog
CPU delayed ...
synchronize_net
- no ongoing RCU
read-side sections
netdev_run_todo,
rcu_barrier: no
ongoing callbacks
__netif_receive_skb_core:rcu_read_lock
- too late
free dev
process packet for freed dev
Fixes: 6e583ce5242f ("net: eliminate refcounting in backlog queue")
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3666,8 +3666,6 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(stru
pt_prev = NULL;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
another_round:
skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -3677,7 +3675,7 @@ another_round:
skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_8021AD)) {
skb = skb_vlan_untag(skb);
if (unlikely(!skb))
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
@@ -3707,7 +3705,7 @@ skip_taps:
if (static_key_false(&ingress_needed)) {
skb = handle_ing(skb, &pt_prev, &ret, orig_dev);
if (!skb)
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
}
skb->tc_verd = 0;
@@ -3724,7 +3722,7 @@ ncls:
if (vlan_do_receive(&skb))
goto another_round;
else if (unlikely(!skb))
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
}
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
@@ -3736,7 +3734,7 @@ ncls:
switch (rx_handler(&skb)) {
case RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED:
ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
- goto unlock;
+ goto out;
case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
goto another_round;
case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
@@ -3790,8 +3788,7 @@ drop:
ret = NET_RX_DROP;
}
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
return ret;
}
@@ -3822,29 +3819,30 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk
static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ int ret;
+
net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
if (skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
if (static_key_false(&rps_needed)) {
struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
- int cpu, ret;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
+ int cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
if (cpu >= 0) {
ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
#endif
- return __netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ ret = __netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -4389,8 +4387,10 @@ static int process_backlog(struct napi_s
struct sk_buff *skb;
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&sd->process_queue))) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
local_irq_enable();
__netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
local_irq_disable();
input_queue_head_incr(sd);
if (++work >= quota) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-09-26 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog "Andre Tomt (LKML)" <lkml@tomt.net> - 2015-09-29 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> - 2015-09-29 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net> - 2015-09-29 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 02:30 +0200
kernel 4.1.9: networking hangs with rcu_preempt self-detected stall, 4.1.8 works; was: Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Wolfgang Walter <linux@stwm.de> - 2015-10-01 13:40 +0200
Re: kernel 4.1.9: networking hangs with rcu_preempt self-detected stall, 4.1.8 works; was: Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> - 2015-10-01 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.1 125/159] net: call rcu_read_lock early in process_backlog Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> - 2015-09-29 21:30 +0200
csiph-web