Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1232703
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core |
| Date | 2015-09-25 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcy71-6D5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qbShr-5pG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbT3Q-6As-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qc9BD-5cV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qc9BD-5cV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qcm5Q-6rx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 03:47:26PM -0500, atull wrote: > Interesting. The amount of code bloat here compiles down to about two > machine instructions (in two places). Actually a little more since I should > be using IS_ERR_OR_NULL. But the main question is whether I should do > it at all. > They kernel already has too many bogus checks for IS_ERR(). It's a very common bug to check for IS_ERR() when you should be checking for NULL. - foo = some_allocator(); + foo = kmalloc(); if (IS_ERR(foo)) goto fail; I have a static checker for "warn: 'foo' isn't an ERR_PTR" but I haven't published it because too much code has impossible checks. > The behaviour I should drive here is that the user will do their own error > checking. After they get a pointer to a FPGA manager using > of_fpga_mgr_get(), they should check it and not assume that > fpga_mgr_firmware_load() will do it for them, i.e. > > mgr = of_fpga_mgr_get(mgr_node); > if (IS_ERR(mgr)) > return PTR_ERR(mgr); > fpga_mgr_firmware_load(mgr, flags, path); > I don't understand completely how of_fpga_mgr_get() ever returns NULL. A lot of the of_ functions return ERR_PTRs if OF_ is compiled in but they return NULL if it's not. I think this is so people can build with COMPILE_TEST so we get more coverage with static analysis? > I could take out these NULL pointer checks and it won't hurt anything unless > someone is just using the functions badly, in which case: kablooey. Linux devs are very good about doing error checking. An early kablooey is what we want for people who don't. Also if you provide a sanity check then Markus Elfring will remove all the error checking in the callers. Don't do it. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2015-09-23 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> - 2015-09-23 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-09-23 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-09-24 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> - 2015-09-24 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-09-25 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] add FPGA manager core Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2015-09-24 01:10 +0200
csiph-web