Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1232645
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations |
| Date | 2015-09-25 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcweR-41f-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qbuIa-54l-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbIUO-gx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbN85-6jv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qc0f0-8nT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qcqMa-4Jw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (09/25/15 11:13), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Ok, I can see that having the allocator backends for zpool
> > have the same set of constraints is nice.
>
> Sorry for delay. I'm on vacation until next week.
> It seems Seth was missed in previous discusstion which was not the end.
>
> I already said questions, opinion and concerns but anything is not clear
> until now. Only clear thing I could hear is just "compaction stats are
> better" which is not enough for me. Sorry.
Agree.
There weren't lots of answers, really.
Vitaly,
Have you seen those symptoms before? How did you come up to a conclusion
that zram->zbud will do the trick?
If those symptoms are some sort of a recent addition, then does it help
when you disable zsmalloc compaction?
---
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index f59e8eb..b6c6a19 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1944,8 +1944,8 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags)
* Not critical, we still can use the pool
* and user can trigger compaction manually.
*/
- if (zs_register_shrinker(pool) == 0)
- pool->shrinker_enabled = true;
+/* if (zs_register_shrinker(pool) == 0)
+ pool->shrinker_enabled = true;*/
return pool;
err:
---
p.s. I'll be on vacation next week, so most likely will be quite slow
to answer.
-ss
>
> 1) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33
> 2) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/2
>
> Vitally, Please say what's the root cause of your problem and if it
> is external fragmentation, what's the problem of my approach?
>
> 1) make non-LRU page migrate
> 2) provide zsmalloc's migratpage
>
> We should provide it for CMA as well as external fragmentation.
> I think we could solve your issue with above approach and
> it fundamentally makes zsmalloc/zbud happy in future.
>
> Also, please keep it in mind that zram has been in linux kernel for
> memory efficiency for a long time and later zswap/zbud was born
> for *determinism* at the cost of memory efficiency.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> - 2015-09-23 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-09-24 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-09-23 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> - 2015-09-24 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2015-09-25 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2015-09-25 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2015-09-25 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 13:00 +0200
csiph-web