Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1232750
| From | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: fuse scalability part 1 |
| Date | 2015-09-25 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcA8P-14l-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pruZI-21q-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qckdI-3Kz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com> wrote: > We did some performance testing without these patches and with these patches > (with -o clone_fd option specified). We did 2 types of tests: > > 1. Throughput test : We did some parallel dd tests to read/write to FUSE > based database fs on a system with 8 numa nodes and 288 cpus. The > performance here is almost equal to the the per-numa patches we submitted a > while back.Please find results attached. Interesting. This means, that serving the request on a different NUMA node as the one where the request originated doesn't appear to make the performance much worse. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: fuse scalability part 1 Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com> - 2015-09-24 21:20 +0200
Re: fuse scalability part 1 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2015-09-25 14:20 +0200
Re: fuse scalability part 1 Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com> - 2015-09-25 20:00 +0200
Re: fuse scalability part 1 Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> - 2015-09-29 08:20 +0200
csiph-web