Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1231788
| From | Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | PIDs Controller Limit |
| Date | 2015-09-24 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qc1Xs-2Cd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Does it make sense for the PIDs controller to allow a user to set a limit of 0? Since we don't cancel attaches, a limit of 0 doesn't affect anything (nothing stops attaches, and you need to have a process in the PIDs cgroup in order for fork()s to be affected by the limit). So I think that attempting to set pid.limit to 0 should return an -EINVAL. -- Aleksa Sarai (cyphar) www.cyphar.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PIDs Controller Limit Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> - 2015-09-24 01:50 +0200
Re: PIDs Controller Limit Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-09-25 17:40 +0200
Re: PIDs Controller Limit Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> - 2015-09-26 01:20 +0200
Re: PIDs Controller Limit Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-09-28 18:00 +0200
Re: PIDs Controller Limit Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> - 2015-09-29 08:20 +0200
csiph-web