Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1230430

Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages'

From Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages'
Date 2015-09-22 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <qbysq-219-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qbxPI-10s-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:31:04 +0200

> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:18:35AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > I guess you hit the right spot, but I'd think people would be
> > > more comfortable with aligning to sizeof (void *).
> > 
> > I would indeed prefer sizeof(void *).
> 
> Do you prefer to have the attribute set for whole structure or for ->next?
> I think attribute on ->next is more appropriate from documentation POV.

Speaking of the documentation POV, I'd recommend adding an
explanatory comment.  Here's hoping this was obvious! ;)

brgds, H-P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define behavior  SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-17 18:30 +0200
  Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-18 16:30 +0200
    Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> - 2015-09-18 17:00 +0200
      Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-18 17:20 +0200
        Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-21 18:00 +0200
          Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-22 03:20 +0200
            Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-22 14:10 +0200
              Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Mikael Starvik <mikael.starvik@axis.com> - 2015-09-22 14:20 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> - 2015-09-22 15:00 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-22 15:30 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> - 2015-09-22 16:00 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-22 17:40 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-22 17:50 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2015-09-23 13:00 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-23 17:10 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-24 07:00 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> - 2015-09-22 18:20 +0200
                Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define  behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages' "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-22 18:40 +0200

csiph-web