Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy

From	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy
Date	2015-09-22 18:30 +0200
Message-ID	<qbyC5-2cv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pYRsT-2l9-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZCBr-4hc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q91Ki-2gb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qb29c-5YD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbnGG-3fP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the
> topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well.
> 
> I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in
> drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.

I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit.

Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the
(alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one?

Thanks,
 -George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the  scheduling domain hierarchy Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> - 2015-09-15 19:00 +0200
  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-09-21 07:50 +0200
    Re: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the  scheduling domain hierarchy Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-09-22 06:50 +0200
      Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com> - 2015-09-22 18:30 +0200
        Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-09-23 06:40 +0200
          Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the  scheduling domain hierarchy Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> - 2015-09-23 10:40 +0200
            Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-09-23 11:50 +0200
          Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com> - 2015-09-23 12:30 +0200
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the  scheduling domain hierarchy Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> - 2015-09-23 09:30 +0200
      Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-09-23 09:40 +0200
        Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling  domain hierarchy Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-09-23 14:30 +0200

csiph-web