Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1229996

Re: [PATCH 00/38] Fixes related to incorrect usage of unsigned types

From Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/38] Fixes related to incorrect usage of unsigned types
Date 2015-09-22 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <qbrTX-12G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qb9u2-83M-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qb9DJ-8gq-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/21/2015 03:42 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
>> Semantic patch finds comparisons of types:
>>     unsigned < 0
>>     unsigned >= 0
>> The former is always false, the latter is always true.
>> Such comparisons are useless, so theoretically they could be
>> safely removed, but their presence quite often indicates bugs.
> 
> Or someone has left them in because they don't matter and there's the
> possibility that the type being tested might be or become signed under some
> circumstances.  If the comparison is useless, I'd expect the compiler to just
> discard it - for such cases your patch is pointless.
> 
> If I have, for example:
> 
> 	unsigned x;
> 
> 	if (x == 0 || x > 27)
> 		give_a_range_error();
> 
> I will write this as:
> 
> 	unsigned x;
> 
> 	if (x <= 0 || x > 27)
> 		give_a_range_error();
> 
> because it that gives a way to handle x being changed to signed at some point
> in the future for no cost.  In which case, your changing the <= to an ==
> "because the < part of the case is useless" is arguably wrong.

This is why I have not checked for such cases - I have skipped checks of type
	unsigned <= 0
exactly for the reasons above.

However I have left two other checks as they seems to me more suspicious - they
are always true or false. But as Dmitry and Andrew pointed out Linus have quite
strong opinion against removing range checks in such cases as he finds it
clearer. I think it applies to patches 29-36. I am not sure about patches 26-28,37.

Regards
Andrzej

> 
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/38] Fixes related to incorrect usage of unsigned types David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-09-21 15:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/38] Fixes related to incorrect usage of unsigned types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2015-09-22 11:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/38] Fixes related to incorrect usage of unsigned types Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2015-09-22 11:50 +0200

csiph-web