Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1230864
| From | Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: irda: pxaficp_ir: use sched_clock() for time management |
| Date | 2015-09-22 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qbBzY-6tc-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9hm4-uy-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9PnH-85q-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qa71f-8fE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbixk-4oB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:36:56 +0200 > >> Which brings me to wonder which is the more correct : >> (a) replace to reproduce the same calculation >> Previously mtt was compared to a difference of 76ns steps (as 307ns / 4 = >> 76ns): >> while ((sched_clock() - si->last_clk) * 76 < mtt) >> >> (b) change the calculation assuming mtt is in microseconds : >> while ((sched_clock() - si->last_clk) * 1000 < mtt) >> >> I have no IRDA protocol knowledge so unless someone points me to the correct >> calculation I'll try my luck with (b). > > "a" would be "safer" and less likely to break anything, although as > you say "b" might be more correct. Indeed. Well, let me try (b) then. I'll add in the commit message the timings change, and if anybody complains a regression pops out, I'll provide a patch to fallback to (a). Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: irda: pxaficp_ir: use sched_clock() for time management Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2015-09-22 21:40 +0200
csiph-web