Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1228866
| From | Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Drop IPC_OLD for direct ipc syscalls? |
| Date | 2015-09-20 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qaKch-5Ic-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qaINc-3Qh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes: > Should I postpone wiring up the direct ipc syscalls on m68k (and thus renumber > __NR_membarrier) until the above is resolved, or can they go in in v4.3? If you wire up the direct ipc calls know you create an ABI that is harder to get rid of. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Drop IPC_OLD for direct ipc syscalls? (was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] m68k: Wire up direct ipc calls) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-20 11:10 +0200
Re: Drop IPC_OLD for direct ipc syscalls? Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-20 12:40 +0200
Re: Drop IPC_OLD for direct ipc syscalls? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-20 15:30 +0200
csiph-web