Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of multi_reg_write/register_patch

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of multi_reg_write/register_patch
Date	2015-09-18 12:30 +0200
Message-ID	<qa15w-8i7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <pNbdD-2PM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pNeuS-7FI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pO8x3-3HR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9V06-7Rq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9ZGq-67w-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:33:36AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:50:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> > It looks like that patch has been forgotten as I am still applying it
> > to the linux-next tree every day ...

> Apologies if I am a little out of my depth here, but are we in
> the situation where you are expecting this to go through the MFD
> tree and Lee is expecting it to go through your tree?

No, -next is a merge down of trees that will be sent to Linus rather
than a tree that is sent to Linus itself.

> Assuming this is the case, Lee could you perhaps pull this fix in
> fairly soon? As it is causing build warning for some configs, in
> Linus's tree at the moment. I am quite happy to resend it on
> Nariman's behalf if required (he is on holiday at the moment).

I'd recommend resending to make sure Lee has the patch.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of  multi_reg_write/register_patch Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-09-18 06:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of  multi_reg_write/register_patch Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-09-18 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of multi_reg_write/register_patch Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-18 12:30 +0200

csiph-web