Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328911
| From | "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/numa: Fix memory corruption on 32-bit NUMA kernels |
| Date | 2016-02-08 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qZRyi-41d-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qZRyi-41d-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 8 Feb 2016 at 1:42, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> y14sg1 <y14sg1@comcast.net> reported that when running 32-bit NUMA kernels,
> the grsecurity/PAX kernel patch flagged a size overflow in this function:
>
> PAX: size overflow detected in function x86_numa_init arch/x86/mm/numa.c:691 [...]
>
> ... the reason for the overflow is that memblock_set_node() takes physical
> addresses as arguments, while the start/end variables used by
> numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() are 'unsigned long', which is 32-bit on PAE
> kernels, but which has 64-bit physical addresses. So we truncate a 64-bit
> physical range to 32 bits and pass it to memblock_set_node(), which corrupts
> memory on systems with physical addresses above 4GB.
i think the truncated values go into memblock_clear_hotplug, not memblock_set_node.
also the sideeffects are unclear to me, from a quick look these values seem to be
used to look up some range in memblock, i don't know if that can lead to memory
corruption per se or 'only' some logical bug later.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index c3b3f65..d04f809 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
> {
> int i, nid;
> nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> - unsigned long start, end;
> + phys_addr_t start, end;
> struct memblock_region *r;
>
> /*
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/numa: Fix memory corruption on 32-bit NUMA kernels "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2016-02-08 11:50 +0100 Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/numa: Fix memory corruption on 32-bit NUMA kernels Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-08 12:10 +0100
csiph-web