Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1327167
| From | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline |
| Date | 2016-02-04 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYyR4-6Xw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qYr3c-8vU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:17:55PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > Slab pages are charged in two steps. First, an appropriate per memcg > cache is selected (see memcg_kmem_get_cache) basing on the current > context, then the new slab page is charged to the memory cgroup which > the selected cache was created for (see memcg_charge_slab -> > __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). It is OK to bypass kmemcg charge at step 1, > but if step 1 succeeded and we successfully allocated a new slab page, > step 2 must be performed, otherwise we would get a per memcg kmem cache > which contains a slab that does not hold a reference to the memory > cgroup owning the cache. Since per memcg kmem caches are destroyed on > memcg css free, this could result in freeing a cache while there are > still active objects in it. > > However, currently we will bypass slab page charge if the memory cgroup > owning the cache is offline (see __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg). This is > very unlikely to occur in practice, because for this to happen a process > must be migrated to a different cgroup and the old cgroup must be > removed while the process is in kmalloc somewhere between steps 1 and 2 > (e.g. trying to allocate a new page). Nevertheless, it's still better > to eliminate such a possibility. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> - 2016-02-04 13:20 +0100 Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: do not bypass slab charge if memcg is offline Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-02-04 21:40 +0100
csiph-web