Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1325887
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation |
| Date | 2016-02-03 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYbhM-67g-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qWe0r-OA-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qWsmK-3ln-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXjAL-11X-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXQwG-BS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXZTk-7cx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016, Ding Tianhong wrote: >Agree, but this patch is going to help the waiter in the wait list to get the lock, your scene probability looks more >too low and I don't think it is a problem. Sure, I was in fact implying its not the end of the world, although it will be interesting to see the impact on different (non pathological) workloads, even if it only affects a single waiter. Also, technically this issue can also affect rwsems if only using writers, but that's obviously pretty idiotic, so I wouldn't worry about it. Thanks, Davidlohr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL. Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-29 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL. Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> - 2016-01-30 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL. huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL. "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-02-01 04:40 +0100
[PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-01 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-02-02 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> - 2016-02-03 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-02-03 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> - 2016-02-04 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-02-03 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> - 2016-02-04 02:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> - 2016-02-05 00:00 +0100
csiph-web