Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1325472
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock |
| Date | 2016-02-03 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qY6i5-2YF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qY6i5-2YF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor()
in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor()
runs concurrently via separate threads.
In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors,
'governor_enabled' was required to be protected using some locking and
we created cpufreq_governor_lock for that.
But now, __cpufreq_governor() is always called from within policy->rwsem
held and so 'governor_enabled' is protected against races even without
cpufreq_governor_lock.
Get rid of the extra lock now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 4fc3889ca7c9..7bc8a5ed97e5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_governor_list);
static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data);
static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
-DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
/* Flag to suspend/resume CPUFreq governors */
static bool cpufreq_suspended;
@@ -1963,11 +1962,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event);
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|| (!policy->governor_enabled
&& (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -1976,8 +1973,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
policy->governor_enabled = true;
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
-
ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
if (!ret) {
@@ -1987,12 +1982,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->governor->initialized--;
} else {
/* Restore original values */
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
policy->governor_enabled = true;
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
policy->governor_enabled = false;
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
}
if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||
--
2.7.0.79.gdc08a19
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 15:10 +0100 Re: [PATCH V2 7/7] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-04 07:50 +0100
csiph-web