Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1325503

Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform

From Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform
Date 2016-02-03 15:50 +0100
Message-ID <qY6UO-3c5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qXNSa-72M-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXQ3E-93-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY5Fq-2vi-63@gated-at.bofh.it> <qY5YJ-2CV-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

On 03/02/16 13:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 13:24:10 Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
>>> Typically we treat those special registers as part of the device itself
>>> and have a single device node for the AHCI controller and that one.
>>>
>>> What is your reason for doing it differently here?
>>
>> Two reasons
>>
>> 1- The hardware is like a proper split rather than additional hidden registers in
>> the same memory space.
>>
>> 2- Tons of devices in the field have the following DT node built in the bootloader.
>>
>>                  uctl@118006c000000 {
>>                          compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl";
>>                          reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>;
>>                          ...
>>                           sata: sata@16c0000000000 {
>>                                   compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci";
>>                                   reg = <0x16c00 0x00000000 0x0 0x200>;
>>                                  ...
>>                           };
>>                  };
>>
>> The patch suggests a way to handle this.
>>
>
> Ok, fair enough. Also, you write in the binding that this is a bus
> bridge, so this indeed matches what the hardware does, and that's ok.

Thank-you.

>
> Does the bus bridge actually translate the entire 64-bit CPU MMIO space,
> or is it possible that it only handles one device (or a couple of
> them) with a fairly limited space?

This uctl is just for SATA devices.

>
> Maybe it's better to represent it as a #address-cells=<1> in the
> example, and have the child device appear at address 0 in there.

Possible in the example.

I'll update the example to

	uctl@118006c000000 {
		compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl";
		reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>;
		ranges; /* Direct mapping */
		dma-ranges;
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <2>;

		sata: sata@0 {
			compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci";
			reg = <0x16c00 0x00000000 0x0 0x200>;
			interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>;
			interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */
		};
	};

>
> For the machines that already ship a DT, that would not matter though,
> it works either way.
>
> 	Arnd
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> - 2016-02-02 19:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-02-02 19:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-02 21:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> - 2016-02-03 14:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-03 14:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> - 2016-02-03 15:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-03 16:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> - 2016-02-03 17:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-03 17:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-03 14:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> - 2016-02-03 15:50 +0100

csiph-web