Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1325013
| From | Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers |
| Date | 2016-02-03 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qY0FH-7K9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qXDJ7-7w3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXLnl-55B-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXLGH-5wZ-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXPhg-7Yl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXQ3E-93-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > So I think I can summarize my point to: if you can enforce correctness, why > > shouldn't you do it if the performance impact is only a single instruction. > > For aarch64 it's 5 instructions. But what's more important (if ever), > another wrapper takes another i-cache line... > <compat_SyS_ftruncate>: > stp x29, x30, [sp,#-16]! > mov x29, sp > bl d40 <do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.3> > ldp x29, x30, [sp],#16 > ret Why does gcc allocate a stackframe here? Don't you have tail call optimization?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-28 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-01-28 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-02-01 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 08:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-02-02 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-02-02 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-03 09:10 +0100
csiph-web