Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1322832
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] cpufreq locking cleanups and documentation |
| Date | 2016-02-01 07:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXfQv-6Rv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qPOBH-5zs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qWs3o-2Yl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 29-01-16, 16:57, Saravana Kannan wrote: > I haven't looked at the cpufreq-tests, but I doubt they do hotplug testing > where they remove all the CPUs of a policy (to trigger a policy exit). They do. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] cpufreq locking cleanups and documentation Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-30 02:00 +0100 Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] cpufreq locking cleanups and documentation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-01 07:10 +0100 Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] cpufreq locking cleanups and documentation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-02-01 13:10 +0100
csiph-web