Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324762
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid |
| Date | 2016-02-03 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXTuz-2P5-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qX8vE-1qF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXcpz-4a3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXd2h-4HH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXdvj-4X4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXCWK-6RP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:28:07AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Just like I mentioned before, keep consistent with rcutorture???
Because rcutorture does it doesn't mean locktorture has to do it ;)
In any case, I'd suggest the same be done for rcutorture.
[...]
>
>Hmmm... If nothing happened, then I agree that it makes sense not to
>print any statistics. But if some testing actually was carried out, then
>we really need to print the statistics.
Right, so how about the following? It introduces an early cleanup helper
that all it does is do torture specific cleanups. I don't really love the
begin/end calls there, but it's not the end of the world and it seems better
than a more messier refactoring. ie, I had also considered adding an 'early'
flag to lock_torture_cleanup() such that we can enable it for this bogus param
scenario, but seems over complicating things and we also call it for such a
small issue.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 8ef1919..05e2649 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -741,6 +741,19 @@ lock_torture_print_module_parms(struct lock_torture_ops *cur_ops,
onoff_interval, onoff_holdoff);
}
+/*
+ * Indicates early cleanup, meaning that the test has not run,
+ * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module. As
+ * such, only perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups,
+ * and avoid anything related to locktorture.
+ */
+static inline void lock_torture_early_cleanup(void)
+{
+ if (torture_cleanup_begin())
+ return;
+ torture_cleanup_end();
+}
+
static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
{
int i;
@@ -811,8 +824,10 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops); i++)
pr_alert(" %s", torture_ops[i]->name);
pr_alert("\n");
- firsterr = -EINVAL;
- goto unwind;
+
+ torture_init_end();
+ lock_torture_early_cleanup();
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (cxt.cur_ops->init)
cxt.cur_ops->init();
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-01-28 05:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-01-30 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-31 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-01-31 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-02-01 03:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-02-01 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> - 2016-02-01 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-02-03 01:30 +0100
csiph-web