Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1324739

Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device

From Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device
Date 2016-02-03 00:40 +0100
Message-ID <qXSI9-29S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qXSoO-1XH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXSoO-1XH-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:11:42PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>
> > However, for raw block devices and for XFS with a real-time device, the
> > value in inode->i_sb->s_bdev is not correct.  With the code as it is
> > currently written, an fsync or msync to a DAX enabled raw block device will
> > cause a NULL pointer dereference kernel BUG.  For this to work correctly we
> > need to ask the block device or filesystem what struct block_device is
> > appropriate for our inode.
> >
> > To that end, add a get_bdev(struct inode *) entry point to struct
> > super_operations.  If this function pointer is non-NULL, this notifies DAX
> > that it needs to use it to look up the correct block_device.  If
> > i_sb->get_bdev() is NULL DAX will default to inode->i_sb->s_bdev.
>
> Umm...  It assumes that bdev will stay pinned for as long as inode is
> referenced, presumably?  If so, that needs to be documented (and verified
> for existing fs instances).  In principle, multi-disk fs might want to
> support things like "silently move the inodes backed by that disk to other
> ones"...

Dan, This is exactly the kind of thing I'm taking about WRT the
weirder device models and directly calling bdev_direct_access().
Filesystems don't have the monogamous relationship with a device that
is implicitly assumed in DAX, you have to ask the filesystem what the
relationship is and is migrating to, and allow the filesystem to
update DAX when the relationship is changing.  As we start to see many
DIMM's and 10s TiB pmem systems this is going be an even bigger deal
as load balancing, wear leveling, and fault tolerance concerned are
inevitably driven by the filesystem.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-03 00:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-03 00:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-03 00:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-03 00:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-03 01:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-02-03 00:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 01:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] dax: allow DAX to look up an inode's block device Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-02-03 09:00 +0100

csiph-web