Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324661
| From | Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor |
| Date | 2016-02-02 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXQQ3-KX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qXg09-6V2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXjU7-19m-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXtgK-8eB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXtTs-iU-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXCN4-6MZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/01/2016 10:36 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 01-02-16, 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> I'm not sure what you mean by "the sysfs lock" here? The policy rwsem >> or something else? > > He perhaps referred to the s_active.lock that we see in traces. > Yeah, that's what I mean. I generally don't use the exact name of the lock in emails (lazy to look it up) if there isn't a lot of chance for mistaking it for another lock. -Saravana -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-30 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-30 12:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-01 07:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-02-01 11:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-01 21:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-02-01 22:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-02 07:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-02 22:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-02 07:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-02 22:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 03:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-03 06:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 08:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-03 06:10 +0100
csiph-web