Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324580
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data |
| Date | 2016-02-02 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXPqV-8iU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qXjU6-19m-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXIIO-32i-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXP7A-7Ux-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 11:47:13 Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/02, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 01 February 2016 17:15:45 Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > I see what you mean now. I checked different gcc versions, and with my patch I get > > the warnings for 4.6 through 4.9, but not for 5.x. > > > > In general, I tried to only address warnings I still see with newer gcc version, > > as they are better about false positives. Do you think it's ok to take the > > patch as is then? Otherwise we probably have to add fake initializations which > > would shut up the warnings but not help with the code quality. > > > > Sure. I was hoping something could be done to restructure the > code to make it easier for the compiler to figure out the > variables would be initialized. But you're the one who's sending > the patch to silence them so if you're satisfied I'm not going to > spend too much time on this. > Ok, thanks! Note that this one patch was for a real bug involving undefined behavior that is now fixed. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-01 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-02 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-02 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-02 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-02 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Roman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru> - 2016-02-03 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: vt8500: don't return possibly uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-03 10:20 +0100
csiph-web