Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324254
| From | Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] kasan: Change the behavior of kmalloc_large_oob_right test |
| Date | 2016-02-02 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXM03-5FW-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qVD0R-7IE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVD0V-7IE-91@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXBQZ-66V-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXL3Y-4VX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
The intention was to detect the situation in which a new allocator
appears for which we don't know how it behaves if we allocate more
than KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE.
I agree this makes little sense and we can just stick to
CONFIG_SLAB/CONFIG_SLUB cases.
However I think it's better to keep 'size = KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE +
something' to keep this code working in the case the value of
KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE changes.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2016 08:34 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:25:06 +0100 Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> depending on which allocator (SLAB or SLUB) is being used
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
>>> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
>>> @@ -68,7 +68,22 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_node_oob_right(void)
>>> static noinline void __init kmalloc_large_oob_right(void)
>>> {
>>> char *ptr;
>>> - size_t size = KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE + 10;
>>> + size_t size;
>>> +
>>> + if (KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE == KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * We're using the SLAB allocator. Allocate a chunk that fits
>>> + * into a slab.
>>> + */
>>> + size = KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE - 256;
>>> + } else {
>>> + /*
>>> + * KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE.
>>> + * We're using the SLUB allocator. Allocate a chunk that does
>>> + * not fit into a slab to trigger the page allocator.
>>> + */
>>> + size = KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE + 10;
>>> + }
>>
>> This seems a weird way of working out whether we're using SLAB or SLUB.
>>
>> Can't we use, umm, #ifdef CONFIG_SLAB? If not that then let's cook up
>> something standardized rather than a weird just-happens-to-work like
>> this.
>>
>
> Actually it would be simpler to not use KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE at all.
> Simply replace it with 2 or 3 PAGE_SIZEs.
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München
Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren Sie den
Absender und löschen Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please
do not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this
e-mail including any attachments. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] kasan: Change the behavior of kmalloc_large_oob_right test Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] kasan: Change the behavior of kmalloc_large_oob_right test Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] kasan: Change the behavior of kmalloc_large_oob_right test Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2016-02-02 17:30 +0100
csiph-web