Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324140
| From | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() |
| Date | 2016-02-02 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXKrg-4kd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qXAie-4OK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXBxE-5VB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXCWK-6RP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXEc9-80M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXElQ-84M-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:19:04AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Memory ordering is confusing enough as it is. We should not make > people worry more than they already have to. Strong rules are good. Confusing and the resulting bugs can be very hard to debug. One of the problems I've experienced is that Linux does support liberal memory ordering, even as extreme as the Alpha. And every once in a while a hardware guy is asking me if Linux their preferred variant of weak ordering and answering honestly I have to say yes. Even advising against it in strong words against it, guess what will happen - another weakly ordered core implementation. To this point we've only fixed theoretical memory ordering issues on MIPS but it's only a matter of time until we get bitten by a bug that does actual damage. SGI and a few others have managed to build large systems with significant memory latencies yet managed to get decent performance with strong ordering. Ralf
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-28 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-01-28 11:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-28 23:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-01-29 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-29 23:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-01 15:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 05:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 06:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 07:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 09:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 09:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 18:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-02 19:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-02 20:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-03 20:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-03 09:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-03 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-03 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 13:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 19:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 23:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> - 2016-02-02 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-02-02 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> - 2016-02-02 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-02-02 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-02 18:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 23:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-02 12:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 13:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-02 13:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 14:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 18:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-02 18:40 +0100
csiph-web