Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1323900
| From | Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf kvm: enable record|report feature on powerpc |
| Date | 2016-02-02 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXF8d-gB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTCVj-845-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTD51-8pm-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXtTs-iU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
HI acme, On Tuesday 02 February 2016 02:36 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28:11AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu: >> + return event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_CPUMODE_MASK; >> +} > This hunk and the next should be on the previous patch, that is not even > compiling... > > You have to compile patch by patch, we can't just test at the end of a > patchkit like this, this destroys bisection ;-\ Didn't aware about that. Will take care of compiling each patch separately next time onwards. > Also you first need to put in place a way to override how to obtain the > cpumode, then you should use it. > > Also this mode doesn't look feasible at all, think about processing > perf.data files generated in !powerpc systems being analysed in a > powerpc system. This has to be dependend on the architecture of the > machine where the perf.data file was recorded, not on the archictecture > of the machine the binary was built for. Valid point. I'll re-think about approach in this case. > It is only when you do live analysis, like with 'perf trace' and 'perf > top' that its guaranteed to be all on the same machine. > > IIRC in one of the patches in this series you introduce and use a > library function on the same patch, please break it into two patches as > well, lemme see what is the name... > > Yeah, it is also in this patch: > > perf_evlist__arch_add_default(struct perf_evlist *evlist) > > Please add this in a separate patch, stating in the changeset comment > why it is needed and how architectures can override it. Will do that. Thanks for reviewing. Regards, Ravi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf kvm: enable record|report feature on powerpc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-02-01 22:10 +0100 Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf kvm: enable record|report feature on powerpc Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-02-02 10:10 +0100
csiph-web