Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1323875
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: 答复: [PATCH] signal: use sizeof() instead of sizeof |
| Date | 2016-02-02 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXElQ-84M-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qXDSO-7AO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXE2u-7EE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXElQ-84M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Am 02.02.2016 um 09:08 schrieb Wei Tang: > This is a simple patch, just to clear up the output from checkpatch.pl > script, otherwise, we will get WARNING always. This does not answer my question. What problem does it fix? How does your patch make the kernel better? Doing patches just because of checkpatch warnings (not errors) is IMHO not good. It is a script and not human, it does not understand all the corner cases. All it can do is giving us hints. But this does not mean that you have to blindly follow them. Thanks, //richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] signal: use sizeof() instead of sizeof Wei Tang <tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2016-02-02 08:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] signal: use sizeof() instead of sizeof Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-02-02 09:00 +0100
Re: 答复: [PATCH] signal: use sizeof() instead of sizeof Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-02-02 09:20 +0100
csiph-web