Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1323822

Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types
Date 2016-02-02 07:30 +0100
Message-ID <qXCDp-6Jl-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qOl8K-1I5-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVQ7O-FX-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:27:28 +0100 Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:

> Current implementation of IS_ERR_VALUE works correctly only with
> following types:
> - unsigned long,
> - short, int, long.
> Other types are handled incorrectly either on 32-bit either on 64-bit
> either on both architectures.
> The patch fixes it by comparing argument with MAX_ERRNO casted
> to argument's type for unsigned types and comparing with zero for signed
> types. As a result all integer types bigger than char are handled properly.
> 
> I have analyzed usage of IS_ERR_VALUE using coccinelle and in about 35
> cases it is used incorrectly, ie it can hide errors depending of 32/64 bit
> architecture. Instead of fixing usage I propose to enhance the macro
> to cover more types.
> And just for the record: the macro is used 101 times with signed variables,
> I am not sure if it should be preferred over simple comparison "ret < 0",
> but the new version can do it as well.
> 
> And below list of detected potential errors:
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/err.h
> +++ b/include/linux/err.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
>  
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
> -#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
> +#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((typeof(x))(-1) <= 0 \
> +				? unlikely((x) < 0) \
> +				: unlikely((x) >= (typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO))
>  

hm, seems complicated.  Can we simply cast the value to long?

#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((long)x < 0) && (long)x >= (long)-MAX_ERRNO)

and simplify that to

#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long)(long)x >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)

or something like that.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-01-28 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more  types Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 07:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-02 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more  types Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-03 01:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-03 12:00 +0100
    [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-03 14:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-04 13:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-04 15:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-04 16:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-04 16:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more  types Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-04 20:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-05 12:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-08 09:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-08 13:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more  types Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-02-09 02:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-02-09 09:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] err.h: allow IS_ERR_VALUE to handle properly more types Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2016-02-05 00:40 +0100

csiph-web