Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1322091
| From | Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: computing drop-able caches |
| Date | 2016-01-29 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qWoMb-IK-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qW4u6-2pQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qW4DN-2tl-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qW5Jv-3s7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qW6vW-3Ny-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <qW6vW-3Ny-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/28/2016 05:55 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:29:41PM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> On 01/28/2016 05:03 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: >> [regarding MemAvaiable] >> >> This new metric purportedly helps usrespace assess available memory. But, >> its again based on heuristic, it takes 1/2 of page cache as reclaimable.. > No, it takes the smaller value of cache/2 and the low watermark, which > is a fraction of memory. Actually, that does look a little weird. Rik? > > We don't age cache without memory pressure, you don't know how much is > used until you start taking some away. Heuristics is all we can offer. With a simple busybox root system I get this, MemTotal: 16273996 kB MemFree: 16137920 kB MemAvailable: 16046132 kB shouldn't MemAvailable be at least the same as MemFree ? I changed the code somewhat so it subtracted the wmark_low only, or the pagecache/2 only, both are still under MemFree. This system has very little drop-able caches. Daniel
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
computing drop-able caches Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com> - 2016-01-29 00:50 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-01-29 01:00 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com> - 2016-01-29 02:10 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-01-29 03:00 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com> - 2016-01-29 22:30 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-01-29 23:40 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2016-01-29 23:50 +0100
Re: computing drop-able caches "Khalid Mughal (khalidm)" <khalidm@cisco.com> - 2016-02-08 22:10 +0100
csiph-web