Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1318932
| From | Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel |
| Date | 2016-01-27 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVxRw-3BF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qUSOm-7cE-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUSOm-7cE-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVvmG-1Z6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:19:27PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hi Torsten, > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:26 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > The gcc switch -mprofile-kernel, available for ppc64 on gcc > 4.8.5, > > allows to call _mcount very early in the function, which low-level > > ASM code and code patching functions need to consider. > > Especially the link register and the parameter registers are still > > alive and not yet saved into a new stack frame. > > > > Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c | 12 +++++++++-- > > arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 14 +++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S > > index a94f155..e7cd043 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S > > @@ -1206,7 +1206,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_prom) > > #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE > > _GLOBAL(mcount) > > _GLOBAL(_mcount) > > - blr > > + std r0,LRSAVE(r1) /* gcc6 does this _after_ this call _only_ */ > > + mflr r0 > > + mtctr r0 > > + ld r0,LRSAVE(r1) > > + mtlr r0 > > + bctr > > Can we use r11 instead? eg: > > _GLOBAL(_mcount) > mflr r11 > mtctr r11 > mtlr r0 > bctr Depends on what you need to support. As Torsten says, the code to call _mcount when -mprofile-kernel is emitted before the prologue of a function (similar to -m32), but after the ELFv2 global entry point code. If you trash r11 here you're killing the static chain pointer, used by C nested functions or other languages that use a static chain, eg. Pascal. r11 has *not* been saved for ELFv2. r12 might be a better choice for a temp reg. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de> - 2016-01-25 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-01-27 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de> - 2016-01-27 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de> - 2016-01-27 14:50 +0100
csiph-web