Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1318443

Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
Date 2016-01-26 23:20 +0100
Message-ID <qVk7V-2la-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qUZmN-3oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:06:40 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> It appears devices requiring ZONE_DMA are still prevalent (see link
> below).  For this reason the proposal to require turning off ZONE_DMA to
> enable ZONE_DEVICE is untenable in the short term.

More than "short term".  When can we ever nuke ZONE_DMA?

This was a pretty big goof - the removal of ZONE_DMA whizzed straight
past my attention, alas.  In fact I never noticed the patch at all
until I got some conflicts in -next a few weeks later (wasn't cc'ed). 
And then I didn't read the changelog closely enough.

>  We want a single
> kernel image to be able to support legacy devices as well as next
> generation persistent memory platforms.

yup.
 
> Towards this end, alias ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DEVICE to work around needing
> to maintain a unique zone number for ZONE_DEVICE.  Record the geometry
> of ZONE_DMA at init (->init_spanned_pages) and use that information in
> is_zone_device_page() to differentiate pages allocated via
> devm_memremap_pages() vs true ZONE_DMA pages.  Otherwise, use the
> simpler definition of is_zone_device_page() when ZONE_DMA is turned off.
> 
> Note that this also teaches the memory hot remove path that the zone may
> not have sections for all pfn spans (->zone_dyn_start_pfn).
> 
> A user visible implication of this change is potentially an unexpectedly
> high "spanned" value in /proc/zoneinfo for the DMA zone.

Well, all these icky tricks are to avoid increasing ZONES_SHIFT, yes? 
Is it possible to just use ZONES_SHIFT=3?

Also, this "dynamically added pfn of the zone" thing is a new concept
and I think it should be more completely documented somewhere in the
code.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 01:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 18:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA "Mark" <markk@clara.co.uk> - 2016-01-26 21:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-01-26 22:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 22:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-26 23:20 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 23:40 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-27 00:00 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 00:20 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 02:20 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 02:40 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 03:20 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 04:30 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 05:00 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 05:30 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 07:00 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-01-27 08:50 +0100

csiph-web