Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1318443
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA |
| Date | 2016-01-26 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qVk7V-2la-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qUZmN-3oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:06:40 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > It appears devices requiring ZONE_DMA are still prevalent (see link > below). For this reason the proposal to require turning off ZONE_DMA to > enable ZONE_DEVICE is untenable in the short term. More than "short term". When can we ever nuke ZONE_DMA? This was a pretty big goof - the removal of ZONE_DMA whizzed straight past my attention, alas. In fact I never noticed the patch at all until I got some conflicts in -next a few weeks later (wasn't cc'ed). And then I didn't read the changelog closely enough. > We want a single > kernel image to be able to support legacy devices as well as next > generation persistent memory platforms. yup. > Towards this end, alias ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DEVICE to work around needing > to maintain a unique zone number for ZONE_DEVICE. Record the geometry > of ZONE_DMA at init (->init_spanned_pages) and use that information in > is_zone_device_page() to differentiate pages allocated via > devm_memremap_pages() vs true ZONE_DMA pages. Otherwise, use the > simpler definition of is_zone_device_page() when ZONE_DMA is turned off. > > Note that this also teaches the memory hot remove path that the zone may > not have sections for all pfn spans (->zone_dyn_start_pfn). > > A user visible implication of this change is potentially an unexpectedly > high "spanned" value in /proc/zoneinfo for the DMA zone. Well, all these icky tricks are to avoid increasing ZONES_SHIFT, yes? Is it possible to just use ZONES_SHIFT=3? Also, this "dynamically added pfn of the zone" thing is a new concept and I think it should be more completely documented somewhere in the code.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 01:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA "Mark" <markk@clara.co.uk> - 2016-01-26 21:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-01-26 22:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 22:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-26 23:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 23:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-27 00:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 00:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 02:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 03:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 04:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 05:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-01-27 05:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-27 07:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-01-27 08:50 +0100
csiph-web