Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1320758

Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:00:03 +0100
Message-ID <qVWdd-4Sp-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qVPOq-x3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVUXM-43r-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVVh9-4b8-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVVTQ-4Lm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVW3w-4OQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Originating-IP [78.47.125.74]
X-Mailer Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1178 (ZimbraWebClient - FF44 (Linux)/8.6.0_GA_1178)
Thread-Topic tracer: Fails to work
Thread-Index jLfDhFD9Vqe8MuR3iemtfdrBY5RtCQ==
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 59
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Original-Date Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:53:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-Message-ID <1504204180.6731.1453992833257.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
X-Original-References <20160128080859.GB6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1069612139.6639.1453988280286.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20160128135733.GQ6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1616014588.6697.1453991896740.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20160128144705.GS6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1320758

Show key headers only | View raw


----- On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:38:16PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> ----- On Jan 28, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:38:00PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Thoughts ?
>> > 
>> > So ideally dumping the trace data would not depend on any of that,
>> > because I can break it all :-)
>> > 
>> > Not being able to access the trace data completely and utterly defeats
>> > the purpose of having a tracer in the first place.
>> 
>> One item I have on my todo list is to allow mapping
>> the tracer buffers (lttng in my case) onto RAM that
>> persists across reboots/kexec using dax and the pmem
>> driver. Since the original system is clearly inactive
>> after a reboot, we can read the buffers from memory
>> without caring about synchronization.
> 
> I would expect the new kernel to use the same buffer for its tracing,
> right? After all, there's no distinction between the old and new kernel
> except a reboot.

The new kernel can allocate the buffers into separate "files"
on the DAX in-RAM filesystem, so the old buffers would still be
there even when running the new kernel.

> 
> In which case, my kernels often start babbling the moment I boot. So I
> need to take care not to scribble the old data.
> 
>> That would be one possible way of handling your
>> snapshot-of-buggy-kernel-trace-buffers use-case.
> 
> Now I wonder if my ipmipower -r is a warn reset :-)
> 
> (I'm assuming the pmem/dax stuff would simply use regular RAM to back
> this stuff)

On x86, many BIOS wipe the memory content even after a warm reset :(
The most reliable solution I found on x86 is to use kexec() to
boot into a new kernel, mount the DAX filesystem again and read the
buffers from there.

I currently have the persistent buffer support implemented for the
lttng userspace tracer, but not yet for the kernel tracer. It's high
on my todo priority list though :)

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-28 09:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-01-28 14:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-28 15:00 +0100
      Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-01-28 15:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-01-28 15:40 +0100
        Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-28 15:50 +0100
          Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-01-28 16:00 +0100
            Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-28 16:40 +0100
              Re: [RFC][BUG] tracer: Fails to work Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-01-28 17:00 +0100

csiph-web