Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1320745

Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze

From Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
Date 2016-01-28 15:50 +0100
Message-ID <qVW3w-4OQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qQb5g-491-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVVh8-4b8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVVK9-4Gz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVVK9-4Gz-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:23:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 January 2016 14:18:15 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > 
> > > I see. In the upstream code you seem to do it in
> > > pcibios_setup_bus_devices(), while arm64 and powerpc do it in
> > > pcibios_add_device().
> > > 
> > No that function is not getting called with generic API's, its getting called with pcibios_init flow which is tightly bound with struct pci_controller microblaze specific structure. So I added pcibios_add_device in pci-common.c.
> 
> Ok
> 
> > > > May be we can add similar on arm and test out, but we might need some
> > > > cleanup in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > > 
> > > I think that would still just be a half-baked solution. This should really be fully
> > > automatic. We could do it in the __weak
> > > pcibios_add_device() for all architectures that don't override it when the bus
> > > was probed from DT, or we could do it in pci_read_irq().
> > When will pci_read_irq() call get invoked ?
> 
> This is called early on when a device gets created in pci_setup_device(),
> so platforms can still override the value later.
> 
> The idea here is that normally a BIOS stores the interrupt number in
> the PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE config space byte, and we just read it from
> there. Generally speaking though, for non-PC systems we tend to not
> have a BIOS that writes these values to start with, and any values
> stored in here have no meaning in combination with SPARSE_IRQ
> and/or IRQ_DOMAINS because the bootloader or BIOS doesn't know
> what IRQ number will refer to hardware IRQ line in Linux.

I think the best way to handle this is through Matthew's series (below),
in the interim a callback in arch code would do, we will clean it up when
Matthew's series goes upstream, it should not take too long.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg45950.html

Thanks,
Lorenzo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge  driver to  work on both  Zynq and Microblaze Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> - 2016-01-28 14:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to  work on both  Zynq and Microblaze Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-28 15:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to  work on both  Zynq and Microblaze Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-28 15:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge  driver to  work on both  Zynq and Microblaze Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-01-28 15:50 +0100
    RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge  driver to  work on both  Zynq and Microblaze Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> - 2016-01-28 15:30 +0100

csiph-web