Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1319541

Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards

From Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards
Date 2016-01-27 20:50 +0100
Message-ID <qVEgj-6M-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qVvZo-2he-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVwVs-2WM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVxou-3nT-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVzzY-4VL-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 01/27, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> > <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It seems anon_vma appeared between lock and unlock.
> >>
> >> This should fix the bug and make code faster (write lock isn't required here)
> >>
> >> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> >> @@ -453,12 +453,16 @@ static void validate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >>         struct vm_area_struct *vma = mm->mmap;
> >>
> >>         while (vma) {
> >> +               struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
> >>                 struct anon_vma_chain *avc;
> >>
> >> -               vma_lock_anon_vma(vma);
> >> -               list_for_each_entry(avc, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma)
> >> -                       anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(avc);
> >> -               vma_unlock_anon_vma(vma);
> >> +               if (anon_vma) {
> >> +                       anon_vma_lock_read(anon_vma);
> >> +                       list_for_each_entry(avc, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma)
> >> +                               anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(avc);
> >> +                       anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
> >> +               }
> >> +
> >>                 highest_address = vma->vm_end;
> >>                 vma = vma->vm_next;
> >>                 i++;
> >
> >
> > Now testing with this patch. Thanks for quick fix!
>
>
> Hit the same BUG with this patch.

Do you mean the same "bad unlock balance detected" BUG? this should be "obviously"
fixed by the patch above...

Or you mean the 2nd VM_BUG_ON_MM() ?

> Please try to reproduce it locally and test.

tried to reproduce, doesn't work.

Oleg.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

mm: BUG in expand_downwards Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-27 12:00 +0100
  Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:00 +0100
    Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-27 13:30 +0100
      Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-27 15:50 +0100
        Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-01-27 20:50 +0100
          Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-27 22:20 +0100
            Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2016-01-28 16:50 +0100
              Re: mm: BUG in expand_downwards Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-29 11:40 +0100

csiph-web