Groups > linux.kernel > #1319137

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device

From	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device
Date	2016-01-27 17:30 +0100
Message-ID	<qVB8K-6ft-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <qTkvo-3Pq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTqra-7RN-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTqKv-7ZR-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVvd2-1UN-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVwiK-2Fz-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [160127 03:19]:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
> > missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
> > linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT
> > definition was forgotten...
> 
> Opinions differ, but ultimately it's up to whoever is responsible for
> accepting the patch, and in the case of ARM SoC based patches, the
> arm-soc maintainers.

Yeah. Sorry for long delay as discussed. I'm applying the $subject
patch finally into omap-for-v4.6/dt today.

We still have at least two fixes left to go that both affect also
n900. But at least I can now sanely test adding new stuff with a WIP
fix for the PM runtime regression.

> The arm-soc maintainers close their trees for development changes a
> few weeks before hand (a patch of mine which was acked etc by 7th
> December never made the 4.5 merge window either, and the alleged
> reason I've been told is because arm-soc was already closed by then).

Heh I too have some pending clock framework patches from December
that I did not repost yet as the maintainers notified that they
rather not take new stuff any longer for v4.5 before the holidays.

Regards,

Tony

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-21 10:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-21 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-01-21 11:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-01-21 17:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-21 18:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 11:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 12:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-01-27 17:30 +0100

csiph-web