Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1317571
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks |
| Date | 2016-01-26 08:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qV5Vg-kA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qV0sy-46L-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the discussion from the series to add slab sanitization > (lkml.kernel.org/g/<1450755641-7856-1-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name>) > the existing SLAB_POISON mechanism already covers similar behavior. > The performance of SLAB_POISON isn't very good. With hackbench -g 20 -l 1000 > on QEMU with one cpu: I doesn't follow up that discussion, but, I think that reusing SLAB_POISON for slab sanitization needs more changes. I assume that completeness and performance is matter for slab sanitization. 1) SLAB_POISON isn't applied to specific kmem_cache which has constructor or SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU flag. For debug, it's not necessary to be applied, but, for slab sanitization, it is better to apply it to all caches. 2) SLAB_POISON makes object size bigger so natural alignment will be broken. For example, kmalloc(256) cache's size is 256 in normal case but it would be 264 when SLAB_POISON is enabled. This causes memory waste. In fact, I'd prefer not reusing SLAB_POISON. It would make thing simpler. But, it's up to Christoph. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org> - 2016-01-26 02:20 +0100
[RFC][PATCH 1/3] slub: Drop lock at the end of free_debug_processing Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org> - 2016-01-26 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] slub: Drop lock at the end of free_debug_processing Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-01-26 17:20 +0100
[RFC][PATCH 2/3] slub: Don't limit debugging to slow paths Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org> - 2016-01-26 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] slub: Don't limit debugging to slow paths Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2016-01-26 09:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-01-26 08:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-01-26 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Speed up SLUB poisoning + disable checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2016-01-26 16:00 +0100
csiph-web