Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315845
| From | Mike Rapoport <rapoport@il.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net |
| Date | 2016-01-24 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUoZY-2CE-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qAMVc-639-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jason, > Jason Wang <jasowang <at> redhat.com> writes: > > Hi all: > > This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is > simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added > descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. There were several conciens Michael raised on the Razya's attempt to add polling to vhost-net ([1], [2]). Some of them seem relevant for these patches as well: - What happens in overcommit scenarios? - Have you checked the effect of polling on some macro benchmarks? > The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was > specified ioctl. Although ioctl is definitely more appropriate interface to allow user to tune polling, it's still not clear for me how *end user* will interact with it and how easy it would be for him/her. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1765593 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/131343 -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net Mike Rapoport <rapoport@il.ibm.com> - 2016-01-24 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 09:50 +0100
csiph-web