Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1317097
| From | Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() |
| Date | 2016-01-25 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUT7I-7lX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qUT7I-7lX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> track_pfn_insert() overwrites the pgprot that is passed in with a value based on the VMA's page_prot. This is a problem for people trying to do clever things with the new vm_insert_pfn_prot() as it will simply overwrite the passed protection flags. If we use the current value of the pgprot as the base, then it will behave as people are expecting. Also fix track_pfn_remap() in the same way. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> --- arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c index f4ae536..04e2e71 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ int track_pfn_remap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgprot_t *prot, return -EINVAL; } - *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) | + *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) | cachemode2protval(pcm)); return 0; @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ int track_pfn_insert(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgprot_t *prot, /* Set prot based on lookup */ pcm = lookup_memtype(pfn_t_to_phys(pfn)); - *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) | + *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) | cachemode2protval(pcm)); return 0; -- 2.7.0.rc3
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> - 2016-01-25 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-01-25 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-01-25 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-27 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-01-27 06:50 +0100
csiph-web