Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1316961
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support |
| Date | 2016-01-25 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUSbE-6CP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTu1H-1V0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, On 21/01/2016 at 17:23:23 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan, > we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost > the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate > drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802. > > By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs > could be supported as well like the max77620. > > This is a v2 of a series that do this, that address issues pointed out > by Krzysztof Kozlowski. The v1 can be found at [1]. > > I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has > a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly but I don't have a > machine with max77686 so I will really appreaciate if someone can test > that no regressions were introduced. > > On an IRC conversation, Alexandre suggested to use the field support in > the regmap API to avoid needing a translation table. I spent some time > to look at it and I'm not so sure if it fits that well in this case. > > It's true that we could model each register as if it has a single field > and provide a different reg address but I'm not sure if that would make > things more clear or cause more confusion for future code archaeologists. > Yeah, Mark suggested that regmap_field may be what we were looking for but I'm not convinced it really fits. > In any case, I think this series are a move in the right direction since > removes code duplication and a complete driver and also allows others to > reuse the driver for another RTC chip. We can later simplify and use the > regmap field API or extend the regmap core if that could make things even > simpler but I propose to do it as a follow up. > I don't have any objection or other comment on that series. So basically, I'm waiting for v3 and I'll apply it. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
[PATCH v2 01/10] rtc: max77686: Fix max77686_rtc_read_alarm() return value Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] rtc: max77686: Fix max77686_rtc_read_alarm() return value Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] rtc: max77686: Fix max77686_rtc_read_alarm() return value Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-22 10:50 +0100
[PATCH v2 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-22 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 12:50 +0100
[PATCH v2 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of pr_warn() Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
[PATCH v2 03/10] rtc: max77686: Use usleep_range() instead of msleep() Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] rtc: max77686: Use usleep_range() instead of msleep() Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 02:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] rtc: max77686: Use usleep_range() instead of msleep() Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-22 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] rtc: max77686: Use usleep_range() instead of msleep() Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] rtc: max77686: Use usleep_range() instead of msleep() Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-25 12:30 +0100
[PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Remove MAX77802 RTC Kconfig symbol Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Remove MAX77802 RTC Kconfig symbol Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-22 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Remove MAX77802 RTC Kconfig symbol Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-22 13:10 +0100
[PATCH v2 09/10] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Remove MAX77802 RTC Kconfig symbol Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-01-25 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-01-26 00:50 +0100
csiph-web