Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1316493
| From | Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc |
| Date | 2016-01-25 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUNlE-33Y-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qULtx-1Kq-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qULWz-1WT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qULWz-1WT-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUMfU-2lm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUMfV-2lm-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/25/2016 11:07 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 01/25/2016 11:02 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>> + By default this option will be almost for free and can be activated >>>>> + in distribution kernels. The overhead and the debugging can be enabled >>>>> + by DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT or the debug_pagealloc command line >>>>> + parameter. >>>> >>>> Sorry, but it's not almost for free and should not be used by distribution >>>> kernels. If we have DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled, at least on s390 we will not >>>> make use of 2GB and 1MB pagetable entries for the identy mapping anymore. >>>> Instead we will only use 4K mappings. >>> >>> Hmmm, can we change these code areas to use debug_pagealloc_enabled? I guess >>> this evaluated too late? >> >> Yes, that should be possible. "debug_pagealloc" is an early_param, which >> will be evaluated before we call paging_init() (both in >> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c). >> >> So it looks like this can be trivially changed. (replace the ifdefs in >> arch/s390/mm/vmem.c with debug_pagealloc_enabled()). >> >>>> I assume this is true for all architectures since freeing pages can happen >>>> in any context and therefore we can't allocate memory in order to split >>>> page tables. >>>> >>>> So enabling this will cost memory and put more pressure on the TLB. >>> >>> So I will change the description and drop the "if unsure" statement. >> >> Well, given that we can change it like above... I don't care anymore ;) > > Ok, I will give it a try, and come back with a rewording or an s390 patch. I have a patch for x86 and s390. powerpc should also be possible. Now it seems that sparc already defines the TSB very early in head.S. Unless we find a solution for sparc to use debug_pagealloc_enabled() I will modify the patch description and resend the patch.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: Ask users for default setting of debug_pagealloc Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
csiph-web