Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1314650
| From | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables |
| Date | 2016-01-22 01:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTxiW-3Zo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qGV9n-Tm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTu1I-1V0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTubo-1Zs-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTv7r-2E4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTvTR-3bF-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >>> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those >>> folks should perhaps help review as well. >> >> I didn't know the kernel could even be compiled with ICC? Thought >> only GCC worked? > > I'm happy with that, just wanted to make sure I raise the flag concern > given the icc hacks on the linker tables. > >> Anyhow - it may be that those fixes were for quite old ICC versions. >> Does the latest one manifest these oddities? > > I am not sure, I yield to Michael as the author of the original ICC > compatibility pieces. If we don't care about ICC let me know and I'll > just drop the stuff. In lack of such statements I'll just keep the > work arounds in place, but I'm more than trilled to drop it. > In general we let the ICC and Clang/LLVM teams communicate with out a post facto. We can't just guess what their requirements are, especially since they are likely to change between revisions. -hpa
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-21 21:30 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> - 2016-01-21 21:40 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2016-01-21 22:40 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> - 2016-01-21 23:30 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-22 01:00 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> - 2016-01-22 01:30 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org> - 2016-01-22 09:20 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> - 2016-01-22 14:50 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-22 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> - 2016-01-22 23:00 +0100
csiph-web