Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator
Date	2016-01-21 17:30 +0100
Message-ID	<qTqht-7Nb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <qQ8h3-2fU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qR8oG-3Fn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRJ4S-3eC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSkQO-38H-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTpEL-7eF-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:

> I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like
> the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be
> lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that
> if we're going to use lists.

We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a
question of how things get instantiated.

> Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you
> prefer.

Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-01-17 01:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-18 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 17:30 +0100

csiph-web